please follow carefully all the requirements 5

/in /by

watch part of city council meeting :http://sanjose.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=11560

Write a three-page report, double spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, on your experience and observations and analysis. A full page is 23 lines long, and does not include four lines with the name of the student, professor, date, title to make it longer. Despite what APA tells you, please don’t do a title page. A three-page paper is required, and 25 points off if it’s too short by one page, and up to 100-points off if short by two pages.

Please don’t name all 10 council members who are there. That’s a space waster, and loses you 15 points. You can tell me how they voted, but don’t just name them elsewhere in the paper.

You will write on things that happen at the meeting. Select one agenda item that causes discussion during the council meeting and take notes on which council members speak and what position they take on the issue. Was there public testimony or comment on the topic? Was there an obvious stakeholder group participating (e.g., Friends of the Library, a neighborhood association)? Did the public or stakeholder testimony seem to influence the Council members?

Select an action item on the agenda that generated discussion (not consent, not committee reports, not proclamations given to local groups) and write about it as follows, using the observations from the meeting and staff report obtained from the city clerk’s website or the city clerk’s office. Review both before you attend to be familiar with the topics at hand. See if the Mercury News has an article or editorial about any of the topics before or after the meeting.

If there is nothing that generates discussion, find some item to write about to answer these questions..

  1. Introduction—every paper will answer these questions. So please include:
  1. How many councilmembers were present? You don’t have to name them! Who else was on the dais?
  2. About how many people were in the audience?
  3. How long did the meeting last?
  4. How many items on the agenda generated discussion?
  5. How many items on the agenda were passed with little or no discussion (not counting consent)?
  1. Analysis of the item. You get to choose the item here, so papers will differ here. Make sure this is a minimum of a full page on your paper, and show the reader where it starts with a number 2 clearly marked on your paper. Please mark this as“Analysis Section” for full credit. If this isn’t done, I will take off 5 points.

  1. Name and number of the item
  2. Who sponsored the item? A city department, councilmember, stakeholder group? (see staff report). You might have to make an educated guess here.
  3. What was the discussion of the item focused on?
  4. What stakeholders spoke about the item?
  5. Did the public testimony appear to influence the council?
  6. Was there newspaper coverage of the item before the council meeting, or an editorial on the item?
  7. Which councilmembers spoke about the item and what positions did they take?
  8. Was the proposed staff recommendation accepted? Were there any amendments?
  9. How much will it cost?

cyber security and the internet of things vulnerabilities threats intruders and attacks quot

/in /by

For this assignment, review the attached research article “Cyber Security and the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Threats, Intruders and Attacks” and evaluate it in 2 pages or less (700 words), using your own words, by addressing the following:

  • What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
  • Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
  • Summarize the overall article.
  • Identify the conclusions of the authors
    • indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis
    • consider alternative explanations for the results
  • Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis -logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions The article you use must be at least 3 pages long and be a primary or original research article.
    • The relevance or importance of the study
    • The appropriateness of the experimental design

When you write your evaluation be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) and a photocopy of the article when you turn in your evaluation.

resiliency consolation final paper

/in /by

Use case attached to help you help fill this out, it should guide you to answer this paper

This is a two-part assignment. In part one you will write a one-page resiliency consultation summary for an individual from your identified population using resiliency theories, concepts, models for risk, positive psychology, and peak experiences in flow. This type of document would be provided to the client after a resiliency consultation and includes a summary of the consultation, and recommendations and resources for the client to consider moving forward. In part two of this assignment you will provide a rationale for the information you provided in the resiliency consultation summary based upon resiliency theories, concepts, models for risk, positive psychology, and peak experiences in flow. You will include both parts of this assignment in one written file for submission to this assignmentment.

The purpose of part one is to apply what you have learned in this course to a resiliency consultation summary and extend your abilities as a human services professional. Part one provides you an opportunity to practice the application of theory to practice. Reflection of your professional experiences as a human services professional will help address the components of part one of this assignment. If you prefer, you can base part one of this assignment on a case study of your choice rather than professional experience. You can create a persona including cultural traits based upon your professional experience or a case study for the individual from the identified population you consult with.

The purpose of part two of this assignment is to conduct an analysis and synthesis of information you acquired during this course, with application in a real-world context. Integrating your professional background, newly discovered research, and knowledge of human behavior related to stages of development is integral for the rationale you provide to support your resiliency consultation summary. Cite research and provide examples of how the research supports your resiliency consultation summary.

Helping your client understand his or her fears and challenges though past experience will influence their future experiences. Accurate description of events with an analysis and integration of risk and resilience concepts aligned with your client’s stage of human development will address the multi-faceted components of resiliency theories, concepts, models for risk, positive psychology, and peak experiences in flow that you have learned in this course.

Assignment Instructions

Suppose you have just opened up a resilience consulting company. Your unique approach to promoting resilience lies in the challenge of writing a resiliency consultation summary. Clients submit their stories and challenges, and provide you with enough information to help support them. Your role is to write a resiliency consultation summary that addresses individual experiences and needs using research and professional experience to help your client. People who are struggling in their personal and professional life come to see you for suggestions in overcoming obstacles. Through understanding patterns of resilience and growth,your clients will better manage their choices and maintain a positive attitude.

Using the resiliency consultation summary you will instruct and coach your client for the future. You will also provide your client with resources for follow up based upon his or her specific needs. Conclude with resources for the client to research that may help him or her continue through the growth process. Provide specific direction for how the client will access the resources, and not just a website link.

Part One

With your experience and knowledge on risk, resilience, positive psychology, and peak experiences in flow, create a one-page resiliency consultation summary with the following sections.

  • Client Description.
  • Identified Problem.
  • Identified Risks.
    • Cultural Factors.
    • Predictive Factors.
  • Recommendation and Resources.
Part Two

Provide a rationale for the information in your resiliency consultation summary using resiliency theories, concepts, models for risk, positive psychology, and peak experiences in flow. Include in your rational provide an alignment for each of the sections of your resiliency consultation to the following criteria.

  • Identify the client’s stage of human development and characteristics.
  • Examine protective and risk factors that have impacted a client’s life to provide a background description of the client and issues presented.
    • Include gender, career (if any), family constellation, marital status, geographic location, education, ethnicity, religious focus, employability, physical or mental limitations, economic status, value system, and roles played by this individual in multiple groups like faith-based groups, social groups, et cetera.
  • Apply a theory of risk and resiliency to the analysis of a client’s needs
    • Set positive, achievable goals, using positive psychology and a strengths-based approach.
    • Provide resilience methods for the client’s successful navigation through life.
  • Anticipate challenges and plan for strategies of coping with changes.
    • Consider potential risk factors that may interrupt the typical pattern of growth for this individual.
  • Apply multidimensional resilience principles to client development.
    • Explain the process of resilience and advocacy approaches.
  • Explain various advocacy resources that could support client growth through anticipated challenges.

Part one of this assignment is written for the client and should be written using understand terms and language that providing information for the client to review and use. Your explanations of processes, advocacy resources, and resilience should pertain to the client’s situation. Part two is written for an academic audience and should apply APA style and mechanics.

Check the assignment scoring guide for the evaluation criteria for your paper.

Submission Requirements

  • Format: Your paper should include a title page, written content, and references page.
  • Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
  • Resources: A minimum of 8 peer-reviewed, scholarly resources and 5 resources (that could include local resources) for the client to reference are required.
  • Length of paper: The body of your paper (not including the title page and references) should be 5–6 double-spaced pages.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

little tokyo tour attraction and dining room

/in /by

I need you to make a brochure tour book (PPT) about Little Tokyo (Los Angeles)

Its have to be Three famous and popular attractions and Three good dining-room in Little Tokyo.

Please introduce these place based on

-Their back ground history

-why it is famous

-why this place is worth to visit

Little Tokyo attractions:

-Japanese American Cultural and Community Center

–The Japanese American National Museum

–Nisei Week Japanese Festival

Little Tokyo Dining-room:

https://www.kcet.org/shows/departures/memories-of-little-tokyo-on-east-first-street(restaurant)

https://www.theinfatuation.com/los-angeles/guides/where-to-eat-and-drink-in-little-tokyo

https://la.eater.com/2019/10/16/20914274/best-little-tokyo-downtown-food-dishes-los-angeles

PLEASE make the grammar and vocabulary as fancy as you can

100-200 words for each place.

quiz 5 lesson 9 and 10

/in /by

Please answer the following two questions within 30 minutes. They do not have to be long, but I must answer the question.

I ONLY HAVE 30 MINUTES

ECON 110

1.In your opinion is the theory of Barstool Economics actually reflecting the distribution of taxes?

2.What is the function of the IFM?

apa research statistics paper

/in /by

Write a 700- to 1050-word paper in which you:

  • Differentiate between correlation and causation.
  • Explain how each is calculated or tested.
  • What is statistical significance and how does it relate to correlation?
  • Describe how they are used in decision and policy making. Provide examples to illustrate your understanding.

Include at least two references.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

if an attacker can retrieve the api and libraries then use these to write an agent

/in /by

If an attacker can retrieve the API and libraries, then use these to write an agent, and then get the attacker’s agent installed, how should Digital Diskus protect itself from such an attack? Should the business analytics system provide a method of authentication of valid agents in order to protect against a malicious one? Is the agent a worthy attack surface?

forum module 05 discussion getting the best for the most people

/in /by

This is only a discussion post. Only needs to be 150 words or less.

How can reason and utility apply to modern society? Does equality of opportunity still exist? Give an example to support your position on both questions.

You are required to make at least one post that responds to your classmates’ posts. In your reply, you need to address specific points made by your classmate(s) within their post and ask a follow up question to promote more thought and discussion on the topic.

Your discussion posts should be reflective, thoughtful, meaningful, and free of spelling and grammar errors.

week 3 hc 405

/in /by

Unit 3 Assignment – Process Improvement Team Plan

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 70
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

After reading Chapter 3 in the text and the articles under this unit’s Supporting Lesson Links (“ICD 10 Conversion: Do or Die” by McGee and “A Look Back on the ICD-10 Transition” by Bowman), prepare a written assignment based on the following:

A huge challenge facing healthcare providers is the October 2015 deadline for transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 – expanding medical diagnosis codes from the current 14,000 to more than 67,000 codes, and expanding procedure codes from 13,000 to 85,000. This huge change involves not only the medical coding profession but almost every aspect of the healthcare provider’s world. In addition to IT professionals who’ll deal with the hardware and software platforms, coding, billing, quality measurement, administrative and patient care processes will all be affected.

Experts suggest that “much of the work will be process-oriented rather than technology oriented”. (McGee, 2012). Many areas of the hospital and many different professionals will need to work together to make sure the ICD-10 implementation happens by October 2015. (If it doesn’t, your hospital will not be able to bill for its services!).

For this assignment, you will take the role of project manager for ICD-10 conversion for Herzing Hospital, a small community medical center. You are not a Health Information Technology professional; your training and expertise are in quality management and teamwork. Your role is to create and manage a team of your fellow employees who will plan for the ICD-10 conversion.

Instructions

  • Create a plan for forming a Performance Improvement Team (minimum 3 pages excluding cover and reference page) paper using APA style that includes the following elements:
  • Introduction: why is this teamwork important for a project of this size and scope?
  • Body: Create a plan Performance Improvement Team by answering the following questions:
    • What type of team will you use, and why?
    • How will you select the team members, what process will you follow?
    • Create a Performance Improvement Team Charter for your team. (you can follow the format in Example 3.1, or create your own)
  • Conclusion: Summarize the importance of process-management for this project, and how your expertise in teamwork will contribute to the quality of the project.
  • Your paper should be a minimum of three pages (excluding cover and reference pages), written in APA style with Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.
  • Use in-text citations where appropriate. Your references should include at least one outside resource in addition to the textbook and the McGee and Bowman articles.

Rubric

Unit 3 Assignment – Process Improvement Team Plan

Unit 3 Assignment – Process Improvement Team Plan
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 27.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 24.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 21.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 18.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
25.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 22.5 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 20.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 17.5 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 15.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 9.0 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 8.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 7.0 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 6.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 70.0