Your best, affordable assignment help service

Are spy applications for mobile an invasion of privacy?


Research title :

Are spy applications for mobile an invasion of privacy?

Specifications:

*** AT LEAST 3 PAGES.

** COLLAGE STUDENT LEVEL – NO PROFESSIONAL WRITING 

MLA FORMAT [ 12pt – Times New Roman – double spaced ].

IN-TEXT CITATION [ MLA ].

WORK CITED PAGE.

AN OUTLINE IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

Describe Ruben Dario’s feelings towards the Roosevelt Corollary.

“To Roosevelt”

99 unread replies.99 replies.

Describe Ruben Dario’s feelings towards the Roosevelt Corollary.  Why would he feel that way. Relate your answer to the poem. 

*Discussions must be at least 250+ words.

Textbook:  The Norton Anthology Western Literature 9th Edition 

What is the major conflict in the work?

 What is the major conflict in the work? How is it resolved?  Why does the conjurer not want to reveal how he did his most impressive trick? What does the conjurer mean when he says to Smith, “I want you to be martyred.”?  (act three)  How does this related to the main point of the play?   

*Discussions must be at least 250+ words. 

Textbook: The Norton Anthology Western Literature 9th Edition  

Write a 2 page (double spaced) reflection discussing your growth and development as an integrative thinker and researcher.

Reflection Paper

Write a 2 page (double spaced) reflection discussing your growth and development as an integrative thinker and researcher. This reflection should point to specific journal assignments as evidence of how your thinking, analysis and understanding of the material and your identity as a researcher has changed. You can also address areas where you would like to continue to develop.

In journal #1 , I said that I did not consider myself a researcher because I only partake in researching when it is required for a college course. I also don’t like how time consuming it is and the writers’ block that often times occur. I also struggle at times with finding sufficient articles which correlate with the topic I have chosen leading me to change my research topic multiple times.

I can continue to develop when it comes to sufficiently researching articles because I feel like I need to chose better keywords when researching articles.

Should the doctor to kill that tourist and provide his healthy organs to those five dying persons to save their lives?

View the following videos.

· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSH-m5GtrzE – In this video, Harvard professor Michael Sandel discusses the classic Trolley Dilemma and its various versions to an ethics class. As you view the video reflect on the scenario presented to you in module overview.

· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FypPSJfCRFk – While the various Trolley Dilemmas represent hypothetical (and thus somewhat unrealistic) situations, this video depicts a modern, real-world example of the application of the same kinds of dilemmas and decisions.

After watching the videos, post a thoughtful critique addressing the following questions:

· How would you respond to each of the variants of the Trolley Problem described below? Be thorough and justify your reasoning. Note: You cannot add any elements to change the situation – i.e., you cannot rush in and untie the people from the tract, etc. You must make the choice between only the options given. For each scenario, think about whether or not the answers to the following two questions differ: What is the right thing to do and What would you do? In each of these cases 1-4 the result will be the death of 1 person and saving the lives of 5 people.

1. Original problem – you are the trolley driver; decision is to pull switch or not.

2. Fat man variant – you are an observer on a bridge; decision is to push fat man or not.

3. Fat man/villain variant – you are an observer on a bridge; decision is to push fat man or not; fat man is the villain who put the five people in danger on the tracks.

4. Loved one variant – you are the trolley driver; decision is to pull the switch or not; the 1 person that would die if you pull the switch is a dear loved one of yours (parent, child, spouse, etc.)

5. Man sleeping in his yard variant – you can divert trolley’s path by colliding another trolley into it, but if you do, both will be derailed and go down a hill, and into a yard where a man is sleeping in a hammock. He would be killed.

· What if instead of killing 1 person to save 5, your action would result in killing 4 people to save 5? Would you change your behavior in any of the situations? Why or why not?

· Transplant variant – This version addresses some of the same core issues as the Trolley Problem but with the following scenario: A brilliant transplant surgeon has five patients, each in need of a different organ, each of whom will die without that organ. Unfortunately, there are no organs available to perform any of these five transplant operations. A healthy young traveler, just passing through the city the doctor works in, comes in for a routine checkup. In the course of doing the checkup, the doctor discovers that his organs are compatible with all five of his dying patients. Suppose that if the young man were to disappear, no one would suspect the doctor. Should the doctor to kill that tourist and provide his healthy organs to those five dying persons to save their lives? How is this the scenario the same and how does it differ from the Trolley Problem?

Reflect on the issues discussed in the video(s) you viewed and post a thoughtful discussion addressing the following points:

View one or more of the following documentaries about prison and the death penalty.

· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keNpA1OMKzU

· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omuq4yZLKek&feature=youtu.be

· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVkRYMvYcWI&feature=youtu.be

· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5wZVdHQvsY&feature=youtu.be

Reflect on the issues discussed in the video(s) you viewed and post a thoughtful discussion addressing the following points:

· What was the speaker’s/narrator’s point of view about the topic?

· What ethical issues and ethical reasoning were argued?

· Do you agree with the documentary’s point of view? Be specific and thorough. Discuss how and why you agree or disagree and how ethics and values contribute to your opinion.

Why is Somalia being the most corrupt county?

TOPIC: GLOBAL BRIBERY/ CORRUPTION

Want 2 pages.

First page: talking about SOMALIA. Why is Somalia being the most corrupt county? Give me 3 reasons and explain each reason.

Second page: talking about NEW ZEALAND. Why is New Zealand being the least corrupt country? Give me 3 reasons and explain each reason.

Show if there are some bribes in officials offices or public sector in each country.

feeling lonely and how that affected your life?

feeling lonely and how that affected your life?

1 page, topic sentence and intro, body; 1: 2: 3 and conclusion .

please very detailed  no reference . simple writing. not complicated writing . 

How The Internet Has Destroyed Privacy

This 6-8 page double-spaced paper (not including Works Cited page) will present an argument on How The Internet Has Destroyed Privacy. Final essay is evaluated on the strength of the ideas and critical analysis of source material, thoroughness and presentation of research, demonstrated understanding of project material, and overall effectiveness in arguing and supporting a focused argument

Essay #4: Argument Paper

This 6-8 page double-spaced paper (not including Works Cited page) will present an argument

related to one of the themes from Everything’s an Argument from Part 5. Final essays are

evaluated on the strength of the ideas and critical analysis of source material, thoroughness and

presentation of research, demonstrated understanding of project material, and overall

effectiveness in arguing and supporting a focused argument.

Your paper will include the following:

• Significant and contextualized argument based on a focused topic

• Argument that is focused, coherent, interpretive, and addresses the complexity, limitations, and/or counterarguments to the main claim

• Detailed analysis with academically credible examples for support of argument

• Logical order of organization with transitions and topic sentences that crystalize main points and sub-claims

• Persuasive information from credible sources

• Correctly formatted MLA in-text citations and Works Cited with at least 6 academically credible sources (at least 3 sources will be from textbook readings and

at least 3 will be academically credible sources that you find yourself)

• Descriptive title that accurately reflects the topic and argument of the paper

• Clear, concise, grammatically correct, error-free academic prose

Characteristics of Strong Arguments

• Are specific and complex

• Go beyond stating the obvious and avoid binary, pro/con perspectives

• Are supported by reasoning and evidence

• Anticipate objections the audience will have

• Address the complexity of issues

• Acknowledge weaknesses or limitations in the argument

• Engage current conversations and discourses surrounding the topic

• Demonstrate the significance of the main claim as related to the topic

• Addresses implications of the argument

Essay #4 A B C D F

Thesis/Position (must state position, reasoning, and acknowledge opposing points of view)

Author clearly states their position on the topic and establishes reasoning for taking that position, while acknowledging the opposition. Thesis is written as an objective, arguable claim and is direct and identifiable.

Thesis includes position, reasoning, and acknowledges the opposition, but may be wordy or stated in a way that somewhat detracts from its force.

All necessary components are evident (position, reasoning, and acknowledgment of the opposition), but thesis is difficult to identify or is worded in a way that detracts from its objective, arguable purpose.

Thesis statement fails to include all necessary components and may or may not be identifiable.

No clear attempt made to construct an arguable thesis statement.

Organization The essay is organized effectively so that format best reflects rhetorical purpose. Essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.

The essay is mostly organized effectively so that format reflects rhetorical purpose. Essay has an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.

The essay attempts a rhetorically effective organizational structure, but some choices may detract from purpose. Essay has an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, though these may not be executed well.

The essay lacks a clear organizational structure; the reader cannot understand why the essay has been organized in this way. Paper may be missing strong introduction, body paragraphs, and/or conclusion.

The essay pays no attention to organization may undermine rhetorical purpose.

Points of Argumentation/Major Claims

All relevant points are argued in the body of the essay in support of the thesis statement. All claims relate back to the thesis, and these claims are identifiable by direct, claim-based topic sentences.

Most relevant points are argued in the essay, and all support or relate back to the thesis. Topic sentences are clear, direct, arguable claims in most cases.

Some relevant points are argued in the essay, and these points support or relate to the thesis. Topic sentences state points of argumentation, but may not do so in the most effective manner (wordy, indirect, or subjective).

Author fails to address major arguments in the issue at hand or fails to relate points argued to the thesis. Topic sentences fail to establish arguable claims.

No attempt made to present logical arguments. No distinguishable points of argument and topic sentences are unidentifiable and confusing.

Evidence All claims are supported thoroughly with evidence in a convincing manner.

Most claims are supported thoroughly with evidence in a convincing manner.

Some points are supported with evidence, but not all and some may not be as convincing as possible.

Little evidence presented; evidence usually not persuasive.

No attempt made to support claims with persuasive evidence.

Strategies of Argument (rhetorical choices: ethos, pathos, logos)

Author is always aware of the most effective strategies of argument within each claim made. This means author has a command of audience and subject matter.

Author is mostly adept at choosing the most persuasive forms of argumentation and demonstrates knowledge of audience and subject.

Author sometimes chooses effective argumentative strategies, but often, due to an inability to relate to the audience in question, fails to persuade or relate information to the audience.

Author does not demonstrate competence in choosing effective strategies of argumentation; little to no awareness of audience demonstrated.

No attempt made to make deliberate choices in terms of argument strategies; no attention paid to audience or their needs.

Counterarguments and Refutations

Writer always recognizes opposing views and spends time explaining these views fairly and refuting them with evidence.

Writer usually recognizes opposing views and explains them and refutes them convincingly.

Writer sometimes recognizes opposing views, but may not represent views fairly or clearly. Refutations are attempted, but may lack depth or evidence.

Writer lists counterarguments, but does not explain or develop these; refutations are present, but are not explained or developed using evidence.

No counterargument or refutation present.

Use of Sources At least six credible sources are used; all quotations and paraphrases integrated effectively

At least six credible sources are used; most quotations and paraphrases are integrated effectively

At least six credible sources are used; quotations are not integrated effectively

Credible sources not used; lack of integration

No attempt to cite sources or integrate evidence effectively

MLA Perfect. Near-Perfect. Consistent errors made. Distracting errors made.

No attempt made to properly format works cited page.

Conventions (tone, grammar, style)

Perfect. Near-Perfect. Consistent errors made. Distracting errors made.

No attempt made to edit or proofread essay.

Revisions The writer addresses all concerns identified through instructor and peer review.

The writer addresses most concerns identified through instructor and peer review.

The writer addresses some concerns identified through instructor and peer review.

The writer does not address concerns identified through instructor and peer review.

No revisions made or revisions entirely unsuccessful.

In what other ways did culture develop in Neanderthal times?

Beginnings of Human Culture

In what other ways did culture develop in Neanderthal times?

The Importance of Language

Why is language so important to a culture?

Gender Language

Gender language reveals how women and men relate to each other.  Exactly what does it reveal about how women and men relate?