use microsoft word 365 to complete the following case problem

/in /by

Use Microsoft Word 365 to complete the following case problem.

You work with a local radio station that will award a dream vacation of one week in a resort area to a lucky listener. Select a destination ( California )and conduct some research to determine approximately how much it will cost your employer to make the vacation available. What travel arrangements are possible? What type of accommodations do you recommend? What activities are there to enjoy in the area, and what are some outstanding restaurants?

Prepare a one- to two- page document, outlining what you think are the best selling points for the area and approximately how much the travel and hotel accommodations will cost the radio station. Use a table to showcase the the results from your research. Select a template, theme, and/or style set to consistently format your document. Also, identify the document as internal draft correspondence for the radio station with an appropriate header, footer, and watermark

homework help 295

/in /by

Question 1 – Pretend you are a health psychologist and you are presenting information to a church group regarding medical decisions. How would you help the individuals understand the rights patients have in making medical decisions and the issues involved with medical decision making when patients are unable to communicate or decide for themselves. How could you be sensitive to the group’s religious beliefs when presenting this information?

Question 2 – Explore the religious issues that are associated with ethically challenging issues such as euthanasia, reproductive technology, and abortion. Compare and contrast the Christian perspective on these topics with another religion of your choosing.

Please provide 2 references for each post

for chemtai 6

/in /by

This assignment will acquaint you with reading and understanding a Supreme Court case. The case is about a business making real business decisions about how it wished to provide employee health care benefits, in opposition to a government mandate of certain types of benefits. The company, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., took a stand in opposition to the government’s position, based on ownership’s religious beliefs, raising a Constitutional question under the First Amendment.

Prepare a written Case Brief of the U.S. Supreme Court case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., that you are reading for this week’s forum. The opinion is available at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf

**The correct case citation to use in your brief is: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014).

  • Download and read: How to Brief a Case — Please follow this to prepare this Assignment. Include a title cover page. You do not need a reference page. (See template.)
  • Download, save, and open to use for Assignment: Word Template. This is the form for this Assignment. Please use it.

Write this in your own words! Submit your paper using the Word Template as aWord document attachment to thisAssignment by the due date. Your paper will go through TurnItIn automatically on submission. If you receive a high TurnItIn score, you may need to revise and resubmit. I am not concerned about similarity relating to the form of the brief. Similarily focus is on use of your own words rather than direct quotes from the case or other sources.

an essay about an english class

/in /by

For this essay, you are being asked to read Jean Twenge’s “Has the Smartphone Destroyed a Generation?” published in The Atlantic during September 2017.

Once you’ve read Twenge’s article and identified her argument, you will then focus on at least three strategies that Twenge uses throughout her article. Once you’ve identified each strategy, you want to analyze how that appeals to either ethos, pathos, or logos. Lastly, you will need to evaluate whether or not Twenge is effective at convincing her intended audience of her argument.

Requirements:

  • 4-5 pages in length
  • MLA 8 Format
  • MLA 8 Works Cited Page
  • Direct quotes make sure you introduce, integrate, and analyze. Don’t simply “drop in” quotes.
  • Because you are asked to write an analysis of an argument, you are required to evaluate whether or not Twenge’s argument was effective or ineffective. Focus on walking your reader through the choices Twenge makes and why she makes them in order to make her argument.
  • Intro: strong hook, background context, introduce author & article, road map of your analysis, thesis
  • Body: identify one of the strategies that Twenge uses; analyze how the strategy contributes to Twenge’s argument; analyze how and why the strategy may have impacted Twenge’s argument; analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the rhetorical appeal (ethos, pathos, logos, and/or kairos)
    • Repeat as necessary
  • Conclusion: So what? Bigger picture? Why should we care? Was Twenge successful or persuasive? What should she add to be more persuasive? Has the smartphone truly ruined the new generation? What are your personal connections to smartphone use?

Evaluation Criteria:

  • Comprehension
    • Effectively addresses all aspects of the prompt
    • Fully grasps Twenge’s article and showcases knowledge cogently
  • Development
    • Details/analyzes article thoroughly and thoughtfully
    • Writer thoroughly addresses elements of the argument, including author, context, purpose, and evidence.
    • Writer successfully identifies both rhetorical strategies and rhetorical appeals
  • Organization
    • Essay flows logically from introduction → body → conclusion
    • Sentence level organization is strong
  • Expression/Mechanics/Grammar
    • Writer uses appropriate syntax, grammar, punctuation

2 page double spaced madison square park walking tour guide

/in /by

You must write up an entry for your assigned site. Think about a good tour guide book and what includes: basic facts and dates, historical importance, unique –perhaps even comical-insights, architectural details, and so on. Remember that tourists are in a hurry, so be sure to balance the need for important information with brevity. Still, your description must be based on facts, so use citations similar to those found in any history paper (although for new sites and businesses you may have to use verifiable websites).

I will give you the assigned site when you got the job.

research on poverty graded discussion 1

/in /by

Write two o more paragraphs answering the following questions:

  • Share your reaction to the YouTube film “Nickel and Dimed: From the American Ruling Class.”
  • Who is Barbara Ehrenreich? Describe her research methodology. What research method did she used?
  • Can her research methodology be considered sociological? Can her research method be considered scientific? Why?

After submitting your answers, please reply to at least three (3) of our classmates’ posts, pointing out their good points as well as any limitation you see in their arguments.

Your original answer to the questions as well as your reply-comments to other students must be of substantial quality in order to get points. Substantial quality includes a demonstration that you have completed the required readings and videos and thought critically about them. Your answers and reply-comments must be original, use your own ideas and words. Do not copy from any website or written material from another person.

You must post your original answers first, in order to see other students’ answers.

If you are new to canvas, check the video on how to participate in a discussion (Links to an external site.) or consult the canvas student guide (Links to an external site.) for a text explanation.

Grading Rubric

Click on the Gear icon located in the top right-hand corner and then click on “Show Rubric” to view the grading requirements for this discussion.

you need to use a piece of wooden cardboard to do this and then take a picture and send it to me you need to a vision board i have already send you a example just like that

/in /by

You need to use a piece of wooden cardboard to do this and then take a picture and send it to me. you need to a vision board. I have already send you a example, just like that,

how does smoking affect fetal development

/in /by

do a journal search to find at least FIVE specific scholarly articles relating to this question. You may find that as you do this search, your topic or question may change. *These journal articles must have been published within the last five to seven years and must be from academic journals. Popular sources such as Psychology Today, Redbook, Newspapers, etc are NOT to be used as sources in an academic paper. Write a summary of each research article. Include the hypothesis proposed, the methodology used, and the results obtained. Include a discussion of one criticism or limitation of each study. After doing this for each article, write an integrative and comprehensive summary statement that draws some conclusions regarding the findings of the articles you reviewed. **Include the MLA OR APA (2010) references for each articles researched (this will be your next to last page). The findings need to be integrated into an effective conclusion regarding the results of the studies you reviewed. Are there contradictions? If so, what, and how would you resolve any contradictory findings. Do the studies support each other? If so, explain how the studies support the evidence. Include a discussion of the relevance of this topic to your lifespan process, and discuss what you feel are additional questions or issues that need to be addressed.

Finally, write a summary essay indicating what you personally learned or gained from this project, as well as a statement of how this particular topic relates to your own life.In what ways will the information you gained from this project alter or affect your own lifespan process? Include online links of the articles that you reviewed with your paper (this will be your last page).

peer review 236

/in /by

Final Draft Peer Review

Please use this sheet to offer your peer comments on his or her draft. You may also leave comments

about writing style or structure.

Title

1. After reading the title, do you know what key issue the policy brief will address?

Abstract

1. After reading the abstract, do you know what problem the paper will be addressing? If so, what

is the problem?

Please note that the problem should not be about which state controls the

disputed territory or how to resolve the territorial dispute.

2. After reading the abstract, do you know what policy options the writer will explore? If so, what

are they?

3. After reading the abstract, do you know what course of action the writer will recommend? If so,

what is it and why does the writer recommend this course of action?

Introduction

1. What background information does the writer provide to help contextualize the problem

discussed in the policy brief? What other sorts of background details (if any) would help you

better understand the problem at hand?

2. Are there irrelevant background details described in the introduction? If so, what are they?

3. What is the specific problem described in the introduction and why is it important?

4. What is the paper’s purpose?

5. What policy options are explored in the paper?

6. What is the recommended course of action, and why does the writer prefer this course of

action?

7. How does the paper progress? What is the paper’s road map?

8. Is the language in the introduction too similar to the language in the abstract (such that

sentences are clearly copied and pasted)?

Problem Description Section

1. What is the subheading for the problem description (it should not be “Problem Description”)?

Does it give a clear understanding of what is addressed in the section?

2. Summarize important details about the problem addressed in the paper. Does the writer

address the problem of statehood (the problem should not be statehood)?

3. What caused the problem that the writer addresses?

4. Are there any irrelevant details about what caused the problem? If so, what are they?

5. Why is the problem described important?

6. Is it clear that the writer thoroughly researched the problem? Are there sufficient sources cited

to convince you that the writer clearly understands the problem?

Policy Options Section

1. What is the subheading for the policy options section (it should not be “Policy Options”)? Is it

descriptive?

2. Does the first policy option clearly aim to resolve the problem described? If so, how?

3. Are the pros and cons of the first option clearly described? If so, what are they?

4. Does the second policy option clearly aim to resolve the problem described? If so, how?

5. Are the pros and cons of the second option clearly described? If so, what are they?

6. If there is a third option presented, does it clearly aim to resolve the problem described? If so,

how?

7. If there is a third option presented, are the pros and cons clearly described? If so, what are

they?

8. Which policy option is the best? Why is this one the best?

9. Are there subheadings throughout this section of the paper to differentiate the policy options

from each other?

Conclusion

1. What are the main take-home points from the paper? Are they clearly described?

2. What course of action does the writer recommend? Why?

3. How might resolving the particular problem at hand help move the conflict case toward

resolution? How might resolving the particular problem reduce the conflict’s intractability?

Writing Quality

1. Did you frequently have to re-read sentences to understand their meaning? This is usually an

indication of poor sentence structure. Please offer some comments for how the writer could

improve on sentence structure.

2. Did you ever ask yourself, “Where is this paragraph going?” If so, this is usually an indication of

poor paragraph structure. Please offer some comments for how the writer could improve on

paragraph structure and flow.