Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment

  1. Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment
  2. Should the intent or motive behind Lewiston’s conduct be considered when deciding sexual harassment activities? Explain.
  3. If you were the district’s EEOC officer, what would you conclude? What disciplinary action, if any, would you take?

Provide Answers are to be in the form of an APA Style Template. You will be addressing this case study, answering the questions in conjunction with a paper assignment. Do not provide just the answers only in your attempt. Also, find at least three articles beyond the textbook, two of them connected to Grantham University Library, one from another approved  and websites beyond GU Library, (Wikipedia, not accepted) that supports, refutes, and or provide Best Practices or other alternatives related to the topic. This assignment is to be at least 1000 words and does not include the words in the Title and Reference page. Assignments less than 1000 words will be graded as not meeting the requirements and will receive a score of 0-50, depending on content.

This assignment is to assess the mastery of your ability to critically analyze case studies to promote best practices from the realm of HRM.

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now