Your best, affordable assignment help service

What is your opinion toward cohabitation?

PLEASE FOLLOW ALL THE INSTRUCTION AS THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO YOU!!!!!

What is your opinion toward cohabitation?  Do you feel it is appropriate for couples to live together before marriage?  You know, “test drive” first?  Do you feel cohabitation will lead to a stronger, happier marriage?  Why or Why not?

Share your response in at least two paragraphs by Friday.

what qualities make the most frightening biological/scientific monster(s)

you’ll be researching what qualities make the most frightening biological/scientific monster(s) and presenting that research via an APA-formatted annotated bibliography.

ou will need at least TWO web sources, at least TWO Academic Database sources, at least ONE print text source, AND ONE source from the Monsters text.  Thus, you’ll have at least six sources.

You’ll also attach a synthesis/argument page to each annotated bibliography—the directions are below. As always, see me if you’re stumped.  When you proofread, note that likely errors will involve:

  • vague pronoun use (it’s easy to craft sentences with a vague “they” referring to the maker of the film),
  • Passive voice (avoiding “they” can lead to really vague “scenes were added” types of statements),
  • Indefinite “you” (check for it and lose it—it will never be correct in an essay like this),
  • MLA v. APA.

for a cover page- answer the following questions in a paragraph each:

APA (most frightening biological/”real” monster)

  1. Why did you choose this particular creature? Is this a monster that terrifies most people, or is there something about it that you are particularly sensitive to?
  2. Globally speaking, how dangerous is this monster to humanity?
  3. Which part of the writing of this APA-based assignment was the worst for you, and how this experience has helped you understand the difference between research in the sciences and research in the humanities.

Discuss the irony in “Civil Peace—both in the story’s title and in Jonathan Iwegbu’s reaction to being robbed.

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO YOU NO OUTSIDE SOURCES I WILL PROVIDE THE INFORMATION!!!

Choose ONE of the following questions and answer it.

1. Discuss the irony in “Civil Peace—both in the story’s title and in Jonathan Iwegbu’s reaction to being robbed.

2. Discuss how Chinua Achebe combines the native language of Nigeria with the English language to make realistic conversations in “Civil Peace.”

Each response needs only to be THREE WELL-DEVELOPED PARAGRAPHS, (about 250-500 words) but if you feel the need to take a topic and run with it, then feel free to do so.  

I will grade your responses based on the following criteria: 

1. I will look at the thoughtfulness of the answer. Your posting should have a thesis and some development to prove that thesis. If you simply answer the question without adding anything valuable to the discussion, then you’ll get a minimal grade. If you raise interesting questions or interpretations to the reading, then your grade will be higher. 

a. NOTE: It is better to only have one or two major points for a thesis and then develop that point fully than it is to have three or four points without developing any of those points at all.

2. The second criterion that I will be grading your response on is surface errors. This is, after all, an English class. Just because this is only a short reader response does not mean that you can have a lot of spelling errors, run-on sentences, sentence fragments agreement errors, missing punctuation, or second person pronouns (you, your, you’re) in your response. Since you had to pass both English 1101 and 1102 to take this class, I will expect you to write your paper with a mastery of collegiate-level grammar.

3. I REQUIRE you to use a minimum of one direct quote (more if necessary) to help solidify your evidence. When you use direct quotes, be sure to-

a. Format the quote properly in MLA FORMAT. If it’s three lines or fewer, use short quote format, complete with setting the quote off with a comma and enclosing it in quotation marks. If the quote runs into a fourth line, then it should be a block quote.

b. CITE the page numbers (for prose) or line numbers (for poetry) for every single quote. Improperly citing a source, or not citing the source at all, will cause the writer to lose points.

I have included two handouts in the MLA folder of our class page.  

THIS ASSIGNMENT IS DUE SUNDAY!!!!!!!

What change(s) would you make if you were required to deliver the same message to someone else?

Locate a bad-news message somewhere on the internet and share a link here. Discuss which method (inductive or deductive) it most closely resembles and explain why the author chose to deliver the bad news. What change(s) would you make if you were required to deliver the same message to someone else? 

Why Women Stay In Abusive Relationship


final paper, you are to write a researched argumentative paper on a specific topic you have 

chosen and been researching since the Topic Essay assignment. You are required to include an 

introduction, at least four supporting arguments, one counterargument/refutation paragraph and one 

source per supporting and counterargument paragraph. You must also adhere to MLA format: Times 

New Roman 12 point font, pagination with last name, correct parenthetical citation and a Works Cited 

page. While there is no page amount assigned, a paper of this nature is likely to need at least 3 pages. 

You are required to use at least 5 sources. Remember that for a Works Cited page, they are to be listed 

alphabetically by last name. These should be scholarly sources, preferably peer-reviewed or academic 

journal, at the least. There is NO cover page required for MLA pap

Can science and religion be reconciled?

TOPIC: Science VS Faith 

My Interests  on the topic: 

I am interested to write on this topic because it is an ongoing discussion that I come across in my day to day life. As a Christian I face a lot of controversy because of my beliefs. Doing my research paper on this topic will allow me to investigate the in and outs of why science and faith cannot co-exist and to also get a better understanding as to why certain people reject faith/religion. 

Potential Research Questions (you can pick your own questions to make paper better):

· Can science and religion be reconciled?

· What are the main obstacles that stop relationships from being formed between people of faith and non-religious people? 

· What is the basis of science?

· What is a belief/faith and how can we define it?

· What is true faith and how can it be defined? 

· What are the pro and cons of being a person of faith?

· What are the pro and cons of being a person who believes in science? 

INSTRUCTIONS: 

The Final Research Paper should be in MLA format: typed, double-spaced, 12-pt font size, 1 inch margins all around, including page numbers and a header (see picture below). You will write a 6-8-pg argument that is thesis-centered and supported with reasons, explanations, and examples. You must have a Bibliography with 10-15 sources and use a minimum of 3 of your sources in your essay directly. 

Final Draft: This draft should be a minimum of 6 full pages and contain a clear thesis, well thought-out reasoning and explanations, a minimum of 3 sources directly quoted or paraphrased, and address any opposition through counterargument and refutation. You must also include your polished Bibliography with 10-15 sources.

NO PLAGIARISM, FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS and PLEASE PERFORM QUALITY WORK

What type of social process would you consider happening between all the groups discussed and why?

Objective:

The objective of this discussion post to expose you to groups and social processes.  You will need to apply knowledge from your readings.

Instructions:

1. In this discussion post, you will listen to the following podcast and Ted Talks. These assigned materials also have transcriptions for those with hearing or language acquistion needs.

A. Assigned Material 1: This American Life: Not So Simple Majority:

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/534/a-not-so-simple-majority (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. 

B. Assigned Material 2: Ted Talk: My Road Trip Through the Whitest Towns in America

https://www.ted.com/talks/rich_benjamin_my_road_trip_through_the_whitest_towns_in_america?language=en (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

C. Assigned Material 3: Ted Talk: Why Gender Equality is Good for Everyone, Men Included

https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_kimmel_why_gender_equality_is_good_for_everyone_men_included?language=en (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

2. After listening to the assigned materials answer the following questions in discussion post. The post should have a minimum of 500 to 700 words.

1. Provide a brief summary of each assigned material.

2. Who were all the different groups represented in all of the three assigned materials?

3. What type of social process would you consider happening between all the groups discussed and why?

4. In the podcast, This American Life: The Not So Simple Majority, what factors led to one group affecting the other?  What were each groups concerns?

5. In the podcast, This American Life: The Not So Simple Majority, Discuss whether primary or secondary groups were represented.  Be sure to provide specifics of each group and discuss why it was either a primary or a secondary group to confirm your analysis.

6. In the podcast, This American Life: The Not So Simple Majority, how would you recommend that their issues be resolved?

7. In the Ted Talk: My Road Trip Through the Whitest Towns in America, what are the down sides to a group segrating themselves from others?

8. In the Ted Talk: Why Gender Equality is Good for Everyone, Men Included, why are the men so angry and why is this harmful to society?

3. Respond to two peers after answering 1 through 8. The responses should be at least 50 words each. 

How can the United States lessen its dependence on fossil fuels?

Introduction:

Proposal arguments are common forms of writing, especially in the professional world. The goal of a proposal argument is to propose a solution to solve a problem. This task requires you to propose a clear solution to a specific problem and then provide evidence to support your recommendation.

Topics:

Note: Choose only one of the following topics for your essay.

•   How can the United States lessen its dependence on fossil fuels?

•    What can be done to address the problem that you discussed in your causal analysis essay in Task 3?
 

Note: If you respond to this topic in your Task 4 essay, please include a note at the top if your essay that lists your Task 3 essay topic, like this: TASK 3 Topic: 

 MY TASK 3 TOPIC WAS GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE.
 

Requirements:
 

A.  Write a proposal essay (suggested length of 4–7 pages). In your essay, do the following:

1.  Respond to one of the given topics.

2.  Provide an effective introduction.

3.  Provide an appropriate thesis statement that previews two to four main points.

4.  Explain the significance of the problem.

5.  Propose a clear recommendation, with support, to solve the problem.

6.  Provide an effective conclusion that includes an evaluation of the importance of the topic.
 

B.  Include at least three academically credible sources in the body of your essay.

1.  For your sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.
 

C.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

What message is the author/rhetor delivering to the audience and how is this accomplished.

Make sure you have use MLA format, page numbers, and your Works Cited page. 

Project #4 Rhetorical Analysis AssignmentPeer Review Draft Due 4/25Final Draft Due 4/30For this assignment, you can choose to expand on your short rhetorical analysis outline, or choose another source, and write an extensive, 4-page rhetorical analysis of it. You need to think of about the message of the source and show how the author communicates the message to the audience. This assignment is designed toward the development of SLO 1 & 2..Content Requirements.

  • Provide a brief context of the source (source is from last 5 years)
  • What message is the author/rhetor delivering to the audience and how is this accomplished. This should be a clear and arguable claim that needs to be supported.
  • A summary of the major lessons to be learned from the rhetorical approaches of the source.
  • Include examples and quotes from your selected source.
  • A minimum of five rhetorical strategies introduced, explained, and analyzed. Highlight the rhetorical strategies after the sentence. Example: Hough’s smile comparing himself to a Boston Terrier on the surface seems innocent enough, imaging himself as a loyal and lovable fighter for a cause, but when we consider that the breed was initially designed to detect rats in dockside warehouses a troubling disconnect begins to emerge. The image shifts from a sturdy mascot to a slavish hunter, a mindless tracker, or a tool meant for one purpose alone–to root out hosts of discontent and disease. (FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE/SIMILE)

Techniques to consider:

  • The use of sensory images (a concrete detail that can be seen, heard, smelled, felt, tasted)
  • The diction (word choices–formal/informal, colloquial, jargon, etc.. and their denotation/connotations)
  • The use of hyperbole, exaggerated diction
  • One use of literary/figurative (similes, metaphors, allusions, analogies, personification) 
  • The use of hypothetical scenarios or examples
  • Rhetorical questions
  • The point of view (direct address-second person, first-person (personal anecdotes/experiences, 3rd person objective, etc.)
  • The types of empirical support (historical references, statistics, expert testimony, data, etc…)
  • The way reasoning works (deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, comparisons, contrasts, associations, process, cause/effect, etc.)
  • Other rhetorical techniques/fallacies (reincorporation, habitual vs. present action, exemplification, opposition, concessions, refutations, common misconceptions subverted, repetitions, interruptions, dialogue, paradoxes, fictional narratives, etc…)
  • Structure (chronology, thematic, increasing or decreasing importance)